Archive for October, 2016

I have not written here in a while. In part, this is because I have been busily pursuing a master’s degree in social work. Now that my formal academic studies are behind me, I should have more time to write (and quite shamelessly re-blog). I am planning to revisit a number of topics that I had wanted to write about previously. One area that I am planning to explore is the relationship and dialogue between the Eastern Orthodox and Oriental Orthodox.I also want to look at the topic of liturgical renewal, as well as topics related to the Western Rite. Anyway, stay tuned.

Video: A rendition of the Sanctus in Hebrew.


Read Full Post »

Dissenters, Depart!

Authoritarianism and the silencing of dissent in the church is an issue that has been of concern to me, especially in light of the alliance that certain national churches have made with the political regimes under which the live and serve.


Recently, I have been told that as a now former Orthodox Christian, I should no longer address Orthodox issues. Sometimes this is through a relatively polite comment, and sometimes via nasty personal messages in which I am accused of being “at best dishonest” and at worst “remarkably disingenuous.”

Such outrage at my commentary is hardly new, but as not a few Orthodox friends predicted, leaving Orthodoxy simply gives critics one more weapon in the battle to silence disagreement. I think it is worth more extended comments on just how problematic are the assumptions which underlie this form of silencing.

Contemporary Orthodoxy appears to have very little capacity to handle disagreement. Declaring tout court that non-Orthodox have nothing to contribute to Orthodoxy only underscores the insistence on conformity and the silencing of disagreement which is currently commonplace within Orthodoxy. The current silencing of priests who disagree on issues of pastoral…

View original post 858 more words

Read Full Post »

Maria McDowell writes about the issue of the policing of the chalice, which has long been on my mind as well.


This last week I have been ensconced in comparative Anglican Eucharistic prayers, those prayers said in relation to the sharing of bread and wine that is common to all Christians. Colin Buchanan argues that Thomas Cranmer, the ‘teflon bishop’ (well, until the teflon wore off as it did for so many…) who is responsible for the first Books of Common Prayer used successive revisions (from 1549 to 1552) to implement an intentionally ‘stepped’ plan of change.1 Cranmer was shifting away from a more Catholic/Lutheran understanding2 of a ‘moment’ of consecration (which implies at the very least an understanding of ‘real presence,’) in which the bread and wine are themselves vehicles of Christ’s body and blood. He was shifting towards the belief that it is only in proper reception that one encounters the presence of Christ, or in other words, only the one who receives the bread and…

View original post 1,925 more words

Read Full Post »